Conclusions from CDF Results on CP Violation in D^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-, K^+K^- and Future Tasks
Ikaros I. Bigi, Ayan Paul, Stefan Recksiegel

TL;DR
This paper reviews CDF results on CP violation in D^0 decays, compares them with Standard Model predictions, and discusses future prospects for detecting CP violation and New Physics effects in charm decays.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of CDF measurements on CP violation in D^0 decays and evaluates their implications for New Physics models like Little Higgs with T-Parity.
Findings
CDF's sensitivity to direct CP violation is comparable to B factories.
CDF's indirect CP violation measurement constrains New Physics models.
Standard Model predicts very small CP violation, not exceeding 10^{-4}.
Abstract
Within the Standard Model (SM) one predicts both direct and indirect CP violation in D^0 \to \pi^+\pi^-, K^+K^- transitions, although the effects are tiny: Indirect CP asymmetry cannot exceed O(10^{-4}), probably even O(10^{-5}); direct effects are estimated at not larger than 10^{-4}. At B factories direct and indirect asymmetries have been studied with <t>/\tau_{D^0} ~ 1; no CP asymmetry was found with an upper bound of about 1%. CDF has shown intriguing data on CP violation in D^0 \to \pi^+\pi^- [K^+K^-] with <t>/\tau_{D^0} ~ 2.4 [2.65]. Also, CDF has not seen any CP violation. For direct CP asymmetry, CDF has a sensitivity similar to the combination of the B factories, yet for indirect CP violation it yields a significantly smaller sensitivity of a_{cp}^{ind}=(-0.01 +- 0.06_{stat} +- 0.05_{syst})% due to it being based on longer decay times. New Physics models (NP) like Little Higgs…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
