Poster Abstract: If You Have Time, Save Energy with Pull
David Hasenfratz, Andreas Meier, Matthias Woehrle, Marco Zimmerling, and Lothar Thiele

TL;DR
This paper compares push and pull data collection methods in wireless sensor networks, demonstrating that pull can significantly save energy if latency is acceptable, by transforming existing protocols and testing on a real network.
Contribution
It introduces a method to convert push protocols into pull protocols and empirically evaluates their energy efficiency in sensor networks.
Findings
Pull reduces energy consumption compared to push.
Long latency is acceptable for energy savings.
Transforming protocols enables easy adoption of pull approach.
Abstract
We analyze push and pull for data collection in wireless sensor networks. Most applications to date use the traditional push approach, where nodes transmit sensed data immedi- ately to the sink. Using a pull approach, nodes store the data in their local flash memory, and only engage in commu- nication during dedicated collection phases. We show how one can transform an existing push-based collection protocol into a pull-based one, and compare the power consumption of both approaches on a 35-node testbed. Our results show that substantial energy gains are possible with pull, provided that the application can tolerate a long latency.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks · Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
