What do we really know about Dark Energy?
Ruth Durrer

TL;DR
This paper reviews the current understanding of dark energy, emphasizing that its primary evidence comes from distance measurements like supernovae, CMB, and baryon acoustic oscillations indicating an accelerated universe.
Contribution
It critically examines the observational basis for dark energy, highlighting the reliance on distance-redshift relations from various cosmological measurements.
Findings
Distance measurements suggest an accelerated expansion.
Current evidence for dark energy is primarily from supernovae, CMB, and BAO.
Alternative explanations for observations are not extensively discussed.
Abstract
In this paper I discuss what we truly know about dark energy. I shall argue that up to date our single indication for the existence of dark energy comes from distance measurements and their relation to redshift. Supernovae, CMB anisotropies and observations of baryon acoustic oscillations, they all simply tell us that the observed distance to a given redshift is larger than the one expected from a Friedmann Lemaitre universe with matter only and the locally measured Hubble parameter.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
