How accurate is it to update the cosmology of your halo catalogues?
Andr\'es N. Ruiz, Nelson D. Padilla, Mariano J. Dom\'inguez and, Sof\'ia A. Cora

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the accuracy of the full rescaling method by Angulo & White (2010) for changing cosmologies in halo catalogues, demonstrating its effectiveness for small simulations and analyzing biases in halo properties and galaxy-related statistics.
Contribution
The study applies and tests a simplified rescaling method for cosmological parameter adjustments in halo catalogues, providing insights into its accuracy and limitations.
Findings
Individual halo positions and velocities are accurately recovered.
Biases in halo mass depend on sigma_8 and Omega_m variations.
Small biases (<10%) in halo abundance and correlation functions are observed.
Abstract
We test and present the application of the full rescaling method by Angulo & White (2010) to change the cosmology of halo catalogues in numerical simulations for cosmological parameter search using semi-analytic galaxy properties. We show that a reduced form of the method can be applied in small simulations with box side of ~50/h Mpc. We perform statistical tests on the accuracy of the properties of rescaled individual haloes, and also on the rescaled population as a whole. We find that individual positions and velocities are recovered with almost no detectable biases. The dispersion in the recovered halo mass does not seem to depend on the resolution of the simulation. Regardless of the halo mass, the individual accretion histories, spin parameter evolution and fraction of mass in substructures are well recovered. The mass of rescaled haloes can be underestimated (overestimated) for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
