Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED
Oliver Viehmann, Jan von Delft, Florian Marquardt

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the standard effective model for circuit QED inaccurately predicts superradiant phase transitions, and provides a generalized no-go theorem confirming their absence in realistic systems.
Contribution
It reveals the failure of the standard model in predicting superradiant transitions and extends the no-go theorem to multi-level artificial atoms in circuit QED.
Findings
Standard model predicts superradiant phase transition erroneously.
Full microscopic treatment confirms no superradiant transition occurs.
Generalized no-go theorem applies to multi-level artificial atoms.
Abstract
We investigate the equilibrium behaviour of a superconducting circuit QED system containing a large number of artificial atoms. It is shown that the currently accepted standard description of circuit QED via an effective model fails in an important aspect: it predicts the possibility of a superradiant quantum phase transition, even though a full microscopic treatment reveals that a no-go theorem for such phase transitions known from cavity QED applies to circuit QED systems as well. We generalize the no-go theorem to the case of (artificial) atoms with many energy levels and thus make it more applicable for realistic cavity or circuit QED systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum many-body systems
