The specific star formation rate and stellar mass fraction of low-mass central galaxies in cosmological simulations
V. Avila-Reese (1), P.Col\'in (2), A. Gonz\'alez-Samaniego (1), O., Valenzuela (1), C. Firmani (1,3), H. Vel\'azquez (1), D. Ceverino (4) ((1), IA-UNAM, (2) CRyA-UNAM, (3) INAF-OAB, (4) HU Jerusalem)

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution cosmological simulations to analyze the star formation rates and stellar mass fractions of low-mass galaxies, revealing significant discrepancies with observational data that suggest earlier stellar mass assembly in simulations.
Contribution
It provides new predictions for SSFR and stellar mass fractions of low-mass galaxies across different epochs using advanced hydrodynamical simulations, highlighting persistent inconsistencies with observations.
Findings
Simulated galaxies have lower SSFRs than observed at low redshift.
Simulations show higher stellar mass fractions than observational inferences.
Discrepancies suggest simulated galaxies assemble stellar mass earlier than observed.
Abstract
(Abridged) By means of high-resolution cosmological simulations in the context of the LCDM scenario, the specific star formation rate (SSFR=SFR/Ms, Ms is the stellar mass)--Ms and stellar mass fraction (Fs=Ms/Mh, Mh is the halo mass)--Ms relations of low-mass galaxies (2.5< Mh/10^10 Msun <50 at redshift z=0) at different epochs are predicted. The Hydrodynamics ART code was used and some variations of the sub-grid parameters were explored. Most of simulated galaxies, specially those with the highest resolutions, have significant disk components and their structural and dynamical properties are in reasonable agreement with observations of sub-M* field galaxies. However, the SSFRs are 5-10 times smaller than the averages of several (compiled and homogenized here) observational determinations for field blue/star-forming galaxies at z<0.3 (at low masses, most of observed field galaxies are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
