Spectral Polarization of the Redshifted 21 cm Absorption Line Toward 3C 286
Arthur M. Wolfe, Regina A. Jorgenson, Timothy Robishaw, Carl Heiles,, and J. Xavier Prochaska

TL;DR
This study re-analyzed the 21 cm absorption line toward 3C 286, correcting previous errors and providing new insights into the magnetic field, polarization features, and multi-component gas structure at high redshift.
Contribution
The paper corrects a software error in previous Zeeman splitting detection and models the absorption with multiple velocity components revealing detailed gas and polarization structures.
Findings
Upper limit on magnetic field strength is <17 microgauss.
Absorption features show velocity and polarization offsets indicating complex gas structure.
Gas components are low-temperature clouds (~200 K) with ~1 pc size.
Abstract
A re-analysis of the Stokes-parameter spectra obtained of the z=0.692 21 cm absorption line toward 3C 286 shows that our original claimed detection of Zeeman splitting by a line-of-sight magnetic field, B_los = 87 microgauss is incorrect. Because of an insidious software error, what we reported as Stokes V is actually Stokes U: the revised Stokes V spectrum indicates a 3-sigma upper limit of B_los < 17 microgauss. The correct analysis reveals an absorption feature in fractional polarization that is offset in velocity from the Stokes I spectrum by -1.9 km/s. The polarization position-angle spectrum shows a dip that is also significantly offset from the Stokes I feature, but at a velocity that differs slightly from the absorption feature in fractional polarization. We model the absorption feature with 3 velocity components against the core-jet structure of 3C 286. Our chisquare…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
