Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay, the Inverted Hierarchy and Precision Determination of theta(12)
Alexander Dueck, Werner Rodejohann, Kai Zuber

TL;DR
This paper discusses how the ability of neutrinoless double beta decay experiments to rule out the inverted neutrino mass hierarchy depends critically on the precise measurement of the solar mixing angle theta(12), affecting experimental design and interpretation.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the dependence of the effective mass limit on theta(12) and offers calculations of half-lives needed to exclude the inverted hierarchy across various isotopes.
Findings
The lower limit on effective mass varies by a factor of 2 within current theta(12) uncertainties.
Background-free experiments require significantly less improvement to reach the hierarchy exclusion.
Comparison of nuclear matrix element calculations from six groups enhances reliability of results.
Abstract
Ruling out the inverted neutrino hierarchy with neutrinoless double beta decay experiments is possible if a limit on the effective mass below the minimal theoretically possible value is reached. We stress that this lower limit depends strongly on the value of the solar neutrino mixing angle: it introduces an uncertainty of a factor of 2 within its current 3 sigma range. If an experiment is not background-free, a factor of two in effective mass corresponds to a combined factor of 16 improvement for the experimental parameters running time, detector mass, background level and energy resolution. Therefore, a more precise determination of theta(12) is crucial for the interpretation of experimental results and the evaluation of the potential and requirements for future experiments. We give the required half-lifes to exclude (and touch) the inverted hierarchy regime for all double beta decay…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
