Choosing Hydrodynamic fields
James W. Dufty, J.Javier Brey

TL;DR
This paper discusses criteria for selecting hydrodynamic fields in continuum mechanics, focusing on granular and multi-component fluids, and evaluates the relevance of temperature and velocity fields for accurate large-scale descriptions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how to choose appropriate hydrodynamic fields in complex fluid systems, including granular and multi-component fluids.
Findings
Temperature is justified as a hydrodynamic field in granular fluids.
Single versus multiple species temperatures and velocities are compared.
Guidelines for selecting hydrodynamic fields in multi-component systems.
Abstract
Continuum mechanics (e.g., hydrodynamics, elasticity theory) is based on the assumption that a small set of fields provides a closed description on large space and time scales. Conditions governing the choice for these fields are discussed in the context of granular fluids and multi-component fluids. In the first case, the relevance of temperature or energy as a hydrodynamic field is justified. For mixtures, the use of a total temperature and single flow velocity is compared with the use of multiple species temperatures and velocities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGranular flow and fluidized beds · Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
