Accurate numerical simulations of inspiralling binary neutron stars and their comparison with effective-one-body analytical models
Luca Baiotti, Thibault Damour, Bruno Giacomazzo, Alessandro Nagar, and, Luciano Rezzolla

TL;DR
This paper compares high-accuracy numerical simulations of binary neutron star inspirals with an extended effective-one-body analytical model, demonstrating the importance of calibrating higher-order tidal effects for precise gravitational waveform predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a calibrated tidal EOB model that accurately reproduces numerical waveforms up to merger, improving gravitational wave modeling for neutron star binaries.
Findings
Calibrated the EOB model's higher-order tidal parameter to match numerical waveforms.
EOB model with calibration outperforms uncalibrated models in waveform accuracy.
Analytical models without higher-order tidal effects show significant dephasing.
Abstract
Binary neutron-star systems represent one of the most promising sources of gravitational waves. In order to be able to extract important information, notably about the equation of state of matter at nuclear density, it is necessary to have in hands an accurate analytical model of the expected waveforms. Following our recent work, we here analyze more in detail two general-relativistic simulations spanning about 20 gravitational-wave cycles of the inspiral of equal-mass binary neutron stars with different compactnesses, and compare them with a tidal extension of the effective-one-body (EOB) analytical model. The latter tidally extended EOB model is analytically complete up to the 1.5 post-Newtonian level, and contains an analytically undetermined parameter representing a higher-order amplification of tidal effects. We find that, by calibrating this single parameter, the EOB model can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
