Emission lines in early-type galaxies: active nuclei or stars?

TL;DR

This study analyzes emission lines in early-type galaxies from SDSS, finding most are likely ionized by stellar processes, with a small subset showing signs of active galactic nuclei, especially those with broader emission lines and radio counterparts.

Contribution

It provides evidence that stellar processes dominate ionization in most early-type galaxies, while identifying a minority with active nuclei based on emission line properties and radio data.

Findings

Majority of RGEs show LINER-like emission, likely from stellar sources.

A small subset (~4%) exhibits Seyfert-like spectra with broader lines.

Radio counterparts are more common in the AGN candidate subgroup.

Abstract

We selected 27244 nearby, red, giant early-type galaxies (RGEs) from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). In a large fraction (53%) of their spectra the [O III] emission line is detected, with an equivalent width (EW) distribution strongly clustered around ~0.75 A. The vast majority of those RGEs for which it is possible to derive emission line ratios (amounting to about half of the sample) show values characteristic of LINERs. The close connection between emission lines and stellar continuum points to stellar processes as the most likely source of the bulk of the ionizing photons in RGEs, rather than active nuclei. In particular, the observed EW and optical line ratios are consistent with the predictions of models in which the photoionization comes from to hot evolved stars. Shocks driven by supernovae or stellar ejecta might also contribute to the ionization budget. A minority, ~4%, of the galaxies show emission lines with an equivalent that is width a factor of ~2 greater than the sample median. Only among them are Seyfert-like spectra found. Furthermore, 40% of this subgroup have a radio counterpart, compared to ~6% of the rest of the sample. These characteristics argue in favor of an AGN origin for their emission lines. Emission lines diagnostic diagrams do not reveal a distinction between the AGN subset and the other members of the sample, and consequently they are not a useful tool for establishing the dominant source of the ionizing photons, which is better predicted by the EW of the emission lines.