On Models of New Physics for the Tevatron Top A_FB
Moira I. Gresham, Ian-Woo Kim, Kathryn M. Zurek

TL;DR
This paper evaluates various new physics models that could explain the Tevatron top forward-backward asymmetry, analyzing their predictions and compatibility with experimental data, and discusses prospects for their detection at the LHC.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of multiple new physics models' predictions with Tevatron data, including efficiency effects and decay reconstructions, to identify viable explanations for the asymmetry.
Findings
W', Z'_H, and axigluon models can produce the asymmetry while fitting the data
Triplet and sextet models struggle to match the asymmetry without conflicting with other measurements
Models that match the asymmetry also align with the uncorrected asymmetry distributions
Abstract
CDF has observed a top forward-backward asymmetry discrepant with the Standard Model prediction at 3.4 \sigma. We analyze models that could generate the asymmetry, including flavor-violating W's, horizontal Z'_Hs, triplet and sextet diquarks, and axigluons. We consider the detailed predictions of these models for the invariant mass and rapidity distributions of the asymmetry at the parton level, comparing against the unfolded parton-level CDF results. While all models can reproduce the asymmetry with the appropriate choice of mass and couplings, it appears at first examination that the extracted parton-level invariant mass distribution for all models are in conflict with Tevatron observations. We show on closer examination, however, that t tbar events in Z'_H and W' models have considerably lower selection efficiencies in high invariant mass bins as compared to the Standard Model, so…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
