Comparing Various Approaches to Simulating the Formation of Shell Galaxies
Ivana Ebrova, Katerina Bartoskova, Bruno Jungwiert, Lucie Jilkova,, Miroslav Krizek

TL;DR
This paper compares test-particle and self-consistent simulations of shell galaxy formation, highlighting their agreement and discussing the importance of including effects like dynamical friction for accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison between different simulation approaches for shell galaxy formation and explores methods to incorporate missing physical effects.
Findings
Test-particle and self-consistent simulations agree on initial shell positions.
Dynamical friction and dwarf galaxy decay are crucial effects missing in simple models.
Inclusion of these effects improves simulation accuracy.
Abstract
The model of a radial minor merger proposed by Quinn (1984), which successfully reproduces the observed regular shell systems in shell galaxies, is ideal for a test-particle simulation. We compare such a simulation with a self-consistent one. They agree very well in positions of the first generation of shells but potentially important effects -- dynamical friction and gradual decay of the dwarf galaxy -- are not present in the test-particle model, therefore we look for a proper way to include them.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
