Drive for Creativity
Leonid Perlovsky, Daniel Levine

TL;DR
This paper hypothesizes that the evolution of internal representations in animals and humans facilitated creativity, driven by the knowledge instinct, with implications for understanding decision making, language, and music.
Contribution
It proposes a new evolutionary framework linking internal representations and the knowledge instinct to creativity and cognitive development.
Findings
Creativity evolved alongside internal representations in animals and humans.
Higher levels of the knowledge instinct are associated with the drive for creativity.
The paper suggests experimental directions to test these hypotheses.
Abstract
We advance a hypothesis that creativity has evolved with evolution of internal representations, possibly from amniotes to primates, and further in human cultural evolution. Representations separated sensing from acting and gave "internal room" for creativity. To see (or perform any sensing), creatures with internal representations had to modify these representations to fit sensor signals. Therefore the knowledge instinct, KI, the drive to fit representations to the world, had to evolve along with internal representations. Until primates, it remained simple, without language internal representations could not evolve from perceptions to abstract representations, and abstract thoughts were not possible. We consider creative vs. non-creative decision making, and compare KI with Kahneman-Tversky's heuristic thinking. We identify higher, conscious levels of KI with the drive for creativity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCognitive Science and Education Research · Cognitive Science and Mapping · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
