A Comparative Study of Confined and Eruptive Flares in NOAA AR 10720
X. Cheng, J. Zhang, M. D. Ding, Y. Guo, and J. T. Su

TL;DR
This study compares properties of confined and eruptive solar flares in the same active region, revealing magnetic field decay and strength as key factors influencing whether a flare is associated with a CME.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of magnetic field configurations and flare locations to distinguish between eruptive and confined flares, advancing understanding of CME initiation.
Findings
Confined flares are more impulsive and closer to AR center.
Eruptive flares have longer durations and more extended brightening.
Decay index of magnetic field is higher for eruptive flares.
Abstract
We investigate the distinct properties of two types of flares: eruptive flares associated with CMEs and confined flares without CMEs. Our sample of study includes nine M and X-class flares, all from the same active region (AR), six of which are confined and three others are eruptive. The confined flares tend to be more impulsive in the soft X-ray time profiles and show more slender shapes in the EIT 195 A images, while the eruptive ones are of long-duration events and show much more extended brightening regions. The location of the confined flares are closer to the center of the AR, while the eruptive flares are at the outskirts. This difference is quantified by the displacement parameter, the distance between the AR center and the flare location: the average displacement of the six confined flares is 16 Mm, while that of eruptive ones is as large as 39 Mm. Further, through nonlinear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
