Reply to "Isotropy of Speed of Light" by Castano and Hawkins, arXiv:1103.1620
Reginald T. Cahill (Flinders University)

TL;DR
This paper critiques a prior claim that the speed of light must be isotropic, clarifying that experimental evidence shows anisotropy and highlighting errors in the previous theoretical argument.
Contribution
It refutes a flawed theoretical argument claiming light speed isotropy and emphasizes the experimental detection of anisotropy in light speed.
Findings
Experimental evidence of light speed anisotropy from Michelson-Morley and spacecraft data
Theoretical flaw in assuming round trip time invariance
Implications for gravitational wave detector designs
Abstract
In "Isotropy of Speed of Light" by Castano and Hawkins, arXiv:1103.1620, it is claimed, using a flawed theoretical argument, that the speed of light must necessarily be isotropic, independent even of experiment. The key false assumption made is that the round trip time must always be invariant wrt change of direction of the light path. This is shown to be false. More importantly the anisotropy of the speed of light has been repeatedly detected in experiments, beginning with Michelson and Morley in 1887, and with the most recent data being from spacecraft earth-flyby Doppler shift data. Similar misunderstandings critically affect the designs for LIGO and LISA.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies · Relativity and Gravitational Theory · Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
