Near-Infrared properties of the X-ray emitting young stellar objects in the Carina Nebula
Thomas Preibisch, Simon Hodgkin, Mike Irwin, James R. Lewis, Robert R., King, Mark J. McCaughrean, Hans Zinnecker, Leisa Townsley, Patrick Broos

TL;DR
This study uses deep near-infrared imaging to analyze the properties of X-ray emitting young stellar objects in the Carina Nebula, revealing their distribution, extinction, and similarities to other star-forming regions like Orion.
Contribution
It provides the first deep near-infrared survey of Carina's X-ray sources, linking infrared properties with X-ray classifications and comparing the initial mass function to Orion.
Findings
88.8% of X-ray sources have infrared counterparts in HAWK-I data.
The K-band luminosity function matches that of Orion, indicating similar IMFs.
Less than 10% of stars show near-infrared excesses, with significant extinction variation.
Abstract
Abbreviated Abstract: The near-infrared study of the Carina Nebula in this paper builds on the results of the Chandra Carina Complex Project (CCCP), that detected 14368 X-ray sources in the 1.4 square-degree survey region, an automatic source classification study that classified 10714 of these as very likely young stars in Carina, and an analysis of their clustering properties. We used HAWK-I at the ESO VLT to conduct a very deep near-IR survey with sub-arcsecond angular resolution, covering about 1280 square-arcminutes. The HAWK-I images reveal more than 600000 individual infrared sources, whereby objects as faint as J ~ 23, H ~ 22, and Ks ~ 21 are detected at S/N >= 3. While less than half of the Chandra X-ray sources have counterparts in the 2MASS catalog, the ~5 mag deeper HAWK-I data reveal infrared counterparts to 6636 (= 88.8%) of the 7472 Chandra X-ray sources in the HAWK-I…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
