Adiabatic quantum optimization with qudits
M. H. S. Amin, Neil G. Dickson, and Peter Smith

TL;DR
This paper investigates how higher energy levels in solid state qubits, modeled as ancilla qubits, influence adiabatic quantum optimization, showing they do not affect the final ground state but impact the minimum energy gap.
Contribution
It introduces a model for higher energy levels as ancilla qubits and analyzes their effect on adiabatic quantum optimization performance.
Findings
Higher energy levels can be represented by ancilla qubits.
These levels do not alter the final ground state.
They influence the minimum energy gap in optimization instances.
Abstract
Most realistic solid state devices considered as qubits are not true two-state systems but multi-level systems. They can approximately be considered as qubits only if the energy separation of the upper energy levels from the lowest two is very large. If this condition is not met, the upper states may affect the evolution and therefore cannot be neglected. Here, we consider devices with double-well potential as basic logical elements, and study the effect of higher energy levels, beyond the lowest two, on adiabatic quantum optimization. We show that the extra levels can be modeled by adding additional (ancilla) qubits coupled to the original (logical) qubits. The presence of these levels is shown to have no effect on the final ground state. We also study their influence on the minimum gap for a set of 8-qubit spin glass instances.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Quantum Information and Cryptography
