Comment on "The Jones-Hore theory of radical-ion-pair reactions is not self-consistent" (arXiv:1010.3888v3)
Kiminori Maeda

TL;DR
This paper clarifies misconceptions about the Jones-Hore theory of radical-ion-pair reactions, demonstrating its internal consistency and correcting prior misunderstandings in the literature.
Contribution
It provides a re-formulation of the Jones-Hore approach and defends its self-consistency against recent criticisms.
Findings
The Jones-Hore theory is consistent upon re-examination.
Misconceptions in previous critiques are addressed and corrected.
The reformulation clarifies the theoretical framework.
Abstract
A short comment on "The Jones-Hore theory of radical-ion-pair reactions is not self-consistent" (arXiv:1010.3888v3) is presented. In the comment, it is pointed out that the paper includes a misconception about the Jones-Hore approach in Chem. Phys. Lett. 488 (2010) 90-93. The re-formulation is presented and it is demonstrated that the Jones-Hore theory is consistent at least on the point claimed by I. K. Kominis in the paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
