Pairwise ranking: choice of method can produce arbitrarily different rank order
Ngoc Mai Tran

TL;DR
This paper compares three pairwise ranking methods and demonstrates that the choice of method can lead to arbitrarily different rank orders, highlighting the importance of method selection in ranking tasks.
Contribution
It proves that for any two of the three methods, different rankings can be produced from the same comparison data, revealing fundamental differences in their outcomes.
Findings
Different methods can produce arbitrarily different rankings from the same data.
The choice of ranking method significantly impacts the resulting order.
The paper discusses the geometric properties of the ranking methods.
Abstract
We examine three methods for ranking by pairwise comparison: Principal Eigenvector, HodgeRank and Tropical Eigenvector. It is shown that the choice of method can produce arbitrarily different rank order.To be precise, for any two of the three methods, and for any pair of rankings of at least four items, there exists a comparison matrix for the items such that the rankings found by the two methods are the prescribed ones. We discuss the implications of this result in practice, study the geometry of the methods, and state some open problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
