Constraint propagation equations of the 3+1 decomposition of f(R) gravity
Vasileios Paschalidis, Seyyed M. H. Halataei, Stuart L. Shapiro and, Ignacy Sawicki

TL;DR
This paper proves the constraint preservation in the 3+1 decomposition of metric f(R) gravity and shows how existing numerical relativity codes can be adapted to simulate these theories.
Contribution
It demonstrates the constraint propagation equations in metric f(R) gravity are identical to those in GR and provides a foundation for numerical implementation.
Findings
Constraint equations are preserved during evolution.
Constraint propagation equations match those in GR.
Existing codes can be adapted for f(R) gravity simulations.
Abstract
Theories of gravity other than general relativity (GR) can explain the observed cosmic acceleration without a cosmological constant. One such class of theories of gravity is f(R). Metric f(R) theories have been proven to be equivalent to Brans-Dicke (BD) scalar-tensor gravity without a kinetic term. Using this equivalence and a 3+1 decomposition of the theory it has been shown that metric f(R) gravity admits a well-posed initial value problem. However, it has not been proven that the 3+1 evolution equations of metric f(R) gravity preserve the (hamiltonian and momentum) constraints. In this paper we show that this is indeed the case. In addition, we show that the mathematical form of the constraint propagation equations in BD-equilavent f(R) gravity and in f(R) gravity in both the Jordan and Einstein frames, is exactly the same as in the standard ADM 3+1 decomposition of GR. Finally, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
