The cosmic X-ray and gamma-ray background from dark matter annihilation

TL;DR

This paper uses high-resolution simulations and observational data to constrain dark matter annihilation models by analyzing their contributions to the extragalactic background light across multiple wavelengths, challenging some explanations for cosmic ray positron excess.

Contribution

It introduces a model-independent method to constrain dark matter properties using full-sky radiation maps and EBL observations, including Sommerfeld-enhanced models, with implications for dark matter detection.

Findings

Dark matter models with significant unresolved subhalo contributions are constrained by EBL data.

EBL constraints are as sensitive as the CMB for probing dark matter scenarios.

Dark matter annihilation alone cannot explain the PAMELA positron excess.

Abstract

(Abridged) The extragalactic background light (EBL) observed at multiple wavelengths is a promising tool to probe the nature of dark matter since it might contain a significant contribution from gamma-rays produced promptly by dark matter annihilation. Additionally, the electrons and positrons produced in the annihilation give energy to the CMB photons to populate the EBL with X-rays and gamma-rays. We here create full-sky maps of the radiation from both of these contributions using the high-resolution Millennium-II simulation. We use upper limits on the contributions of unknown sources to the EBL to constrain the intrinsic properties of dark matter using a model-independent approach that can be employed as a template to test different particle physics models (including those with a Sommerfeld enhancement). These upper limits are based on observations spanning eight orders of magnitude in energy (from soft X-rays measured by CHANDRA to gamma-rays measured by Fermi), and on expectations for the contributions from blazars and star forming galaxies. To exemplify this approach, we analyze a set of benchmark Sommerfeld-enhanced models that give the correct dark matter abundance, satisfy CMB constraints, and fit the cosmic ray spectra measured by PAMELA and Fermi without any contribution from local subhalos. We find that these models are in conflict with the EBL constraints unless the contribution of unresolved subhalos is small and the annihilation signal dominates the EBL. We conclude that provided the collisionless cold dark matter paradigm is accurate, even for conservative estimates of the contribution from unresolved subhalos and astrophysical backgrounds, the EBL is at least as sensitive a probe of these types of scenarios as the CMB. Our results disfavor an explanation of the positron excess measured by PAMELA based only on dark matter annihilation in the smooth Galactic halo.