Comments on Kormendy, Bender & Cornell (2011, Nature, 469, 374)
Alister W. Graham
TL;DR
This paper critically discusses and raises concerns about the data analysis and conclusions of Kormendy, Bender & Cornell's 2011 article on supermassive black holes and galaxy structures.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique and broader historical context of the original study, highlighting potential issues in their analysis and interpretations.
Findings
Raises scientific concerns about the original data analysis.
Provides a broader historical perspective on the topic.
Questions the conclusions drawn in the original article.
Abstract
Comments on Kormendy, Bender & Cornell's (2011, Nature, 469, 374) article "Supermassive black holes do not correlate with galaxy disks or pseudobulges" are provided. A number of scientific concerns regarding the data analysis and conclusions are discussed. A broader historical perspective - difficult for authors to supply within the confines of a Nature article - is also provided.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpecies Distribution and Climate Change