Response to Shalaby's Comment on "Families of Particles with Different Masses in PT-Symmetric Quantum Field Theory"
Carl M. Bender, S. P. Klevansky

TL;DR
This paper refutes Shalaby's criticism of their previous work on PT-symmetric quantum field theory, demonstrating that his arguments are flawed and based on incorrect methods and interpretations.
Contribution
The authors clarify and defend their original results by identifying and explaining flaws in Shalaby's critique, reaffirming the validity of their findings.
Findings
Shalaby's variational approach is invalid
His physical interpretation is incorrect
The original results remain correct and unchallenged
Abstract
In a recent Comment [arXiv: 1101.3980] Shalaby criticised our paper "Families of Particles with Different Masses in PT-Symmetric Quantum Field Theory" [arXiv:1002.3253]. On examining his arguments, we find that there are serious flaws at almost every stage of his Comment. In view of space and time considerations, we point out the major flaws that render his arguments invalid. Essentially Shalaby is attempting to obtain our results from a variational principle and to find a physical interpretation of his calculation. The variational procedure that he uses is inapplicable, and his description of the physics is wrong. We thus refute his criticism on all levels.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOrigins and Evolution of Life · Neutrino Physics Research · Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
