The Simplest Demonstrations of Quantum Nonlocality
Dylan J. Saunders, Matthew S. Palsson, Geoff J. Pryde, Andrew J., Scott, Stephen M. Barnett, Howard M. Wiseman

TL;DR
This paper explores the minimal complexity required to demonstrate quantum nonlocality phenomena like Bell violations, EPR-steering, and entanglement, revealing a hierarchy and proposing simplified measurement strategies that are robust and alignment-free.
Contribution
It introduces a hierarchy of complexity costs for demonstrating quantum correlations and derives minimal measurement schemes using circular 2-designs, including alignment-free photonic demonstrations.
Findings
Bell violation tests are simplest with CHSH inequality.
EPR-steering and entanglement tests can be minimized with non-projective measurements.
Photonic experiments show correlation independence from polarizer angles.
Abstract
We investigate the complexity cost of demonstrating the key types of nonclassical correlations --- Bell inequality violation, EPR-steering, and entanglement --- with independent agents, theoretically and in a photonic experiment. We show that the complexity cost exhibits a hierarchy among these three tasks, mirroring the recently-discovered hierarchy for how robust they are to noise. For Bell inequality violations, the simplest test is the well-known CHSH test, but for EPR-steering and entanglement the tests that involve the fewest number of detection patterns require non-projective measurements. The simplest EPR-steering requires a choice of projective measurement for one agent and a single non-projective measurement for the other, while the simplest entanglement test uses just a single non-projective measurement for each agent. In both of these cases, we derive our inequalities using…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
