A Search for Additional Planets in Five of the Exoplanetary Systems Studied by the NASA EPOXI Mission
Sarah Ballard, Jessie L. Christiansen, David Charbonneau, Drake, Deming, Matthew J. Holman, Michael F. A'Hearn, Dennis D. Wellnitz, Richard K., Barry, Marc J. Kuchner, Timothy A. Livengood, Tilak Hewagama, Jessica M., Sunshine, Don L. Hampton, Carey M. Lisse, Sara Seager

TL;DR
This study used high-precision photometry from NASA's EPOXI mission to search for additional planets in five exoplanetary systems, finding no new transits but setting limits on possible companion sizes and orbital configurations.
Contribution
The paper provides the first constraints on additional planets in these systems using EPOXI data, including sensitivity limits for various planet sizes and resonance configurations.
Findings
No additional transits detected above the sensitivity threshold.
Constraints on the sizes of potential undetected planets in specific resonances.
Limits on transiting planet radii assuming slight orbital misalignments.
Abstract
We present time series photometry and constraints on additional planets in five of the exoplanetary systems studied by the EPOCh (Extrasolar Planet Observation and Characterization) component of the NASA EPOXI mission: HAT-P-4, TrES-3, TrES-2, WASP-3, and HAT-P-7. We conduct a search of the high-precision time series for photometric transits of additional planets. We find no candidate transits with significance higher than our detection limit. From Monte Carlo tests of the time series using putative periods from 0.5 days to 7 days, we demonstrate the sensitivity to detect Neptune-sized companions around TrES-2, sub-Saturn-sized companions in the HAT-P-4, TrES-3, and WASP-3 systems, and Saturn-sized companions around HAT-P-7. We investigate in particular our sensitivity to additional transits in the dynamically favorable 3:2 and 2:1 exterior resonances with the known exoplanets: if we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
