Precise Stellar Radial Velocities of an M Dwarf with a Michelson Interferometer and a Medium-resolution Near-infrared Spectrograph
Philip S. Muirhead, Jerry Edelstein, David J. Erskine, Jason T., Wright, Matthew W. Muterspaugh, Kevin R. Covey, Edward H. Wishnow, Katherine, Hamren, Phillip Andelson, David Kimber, Tony Mercer, Samuel P. Halverson,, Andrew Vanderburg, Daniel Mondo, Agnieszka Czeszumska

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates a near-infrared radial velocity measurement technique using a Michelson interferometer and medium-resolution spectrograph, achieving high precision on an M dwarf, which is promising for exoplanet detection.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel combination of a Michelson interferometer with a medium-resolution near-infrared spectrograph for precise radial velocity measurements of M dwarfs.
Findings
Achieved less than 37 m/s RMS precision in radial velocity measurements.
Performance is within a factor of 2 of photon-limited precision.
Identified telluric contamination as a source of systematic noise.
Abstract
Precise near-infrared radial velocimetry enables efficient detection and transit verification of low-mass extrasolar planets orbiting M dwarf hosts, which are faint for visible-wavelength radial velocity surveys. The TripleSpec Exoplanet Discovery Instrument, or TEDI, is the combination of a variable-delay Michelson interferometer and a medium-resolution (R=2700) near-infrared spectrograph on the Palomar 200" Hale Telescope. We used TEDI to monitor GJ 699, a nearby mid-M dwarf, over 11 nights spread across 3 months. Analysis of 106 independent observations reveals a root-mean-square precision of less than 37 m/s for 5 minutes of integration time. This performance is within a factor of 2 of our expected photon-limited precision. We further decompose the residuals into a 33 m/s white noise component, and a 15 m/s systematic noise component, which we identify as likely due to contamination…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
