A critical analysis of the UV-continuum slopes of high-redshift galaxies; no evidence (yet) for extreme stellar populations at z > 6
J. S. Dunlop, R. J. McLure, B. E. Robertson, R. S. Ellis, D. P. Stark,, M. Cirasuolo, L. de Ravel

TL;DR
This study critically examines the evidence for extremely blue UV slopes in high-redshift galaxies, finding no conclusive evidence for slopes bluer than beta ~ -2, and highlighting the importance of robust data analysis.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed analysis showing that previous claims of ultra-blue UV slopes at z > 6 may be biased by noise and selection effects, emphasizing the need for careful data handling.
Findings
Average UV slope beta is around -2.05 for z=5-7.
Bias towards artificially blue slopes occurs near detection limits.
No definitive evidence for beta < -2 in robust high-z galaxy samples.
Abstract
It has recently been reported that the faintest galaxies at z~6-7 display extremely blue UV continuum slopes, with a UV power-law index beta ~ -3. Such slopes are bluer than previously reported for any other galaxy population, and imply extinction-free, young, very low-metallicity stellar populations with a high ionizing photon escape fraction. Here we undertake a critical study of the evidence for such extreme values of beta, combining three new WFC3/IR-selected samples of galaxies spanning ~2 decades in UV luminosity over the redshift range z~4.5-8. We explore the impact of inclusion/exclusion of less robust high-z candidates, and use the varying depths of the samples to explore the effects of noise and selection bias. Simple data-consistency arguments suggest that artificially blue average values of beta can result when the analysis is extended into the deepest ~ 0.5-mag bin of these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
