The Basal Chromospheric Mg II h+k Flux of Evolved Stars: Probing the Energy Dissipation of Giant Chromospheres

TL;DR

This study measures Mg II h+k line emission in 177 evolved stars to establish a basal chromospheric flux limit, revealing its dependence on effective temperature and minimal variation with gravity, supporting acoustic wave heating models.

Contribution

It provides a large-scale empirical determination of the basal chromospheric Mg II flux in evolved stars and confirms its relation to stellar temperature and gravity, aligning with theoretical models.

Findings

Established a basal Mg II flux relation with T_eff for evolved stars.

Confirmed the basal flux limit remains stable over decades in multiple stars.

Supported acoustic wave dissipation as a key heating mechanism in giant chromospheres.

Abstract

Of a total of 177 cool G, K, and M giants and supergiants, we measured the Mg II h+k line emission of extended chromospheres in high-resolution (LWR) IUE spectra by using the IUE final data archive at STScI, and derived the respective stellar surface fluxes. They represent the chromospheric radiative energy losses presumably related to basal heating by the dissipation of acoustic waves, plus a highly variable contribution due to magnetic activity. Thanks to the large sample size, we find a very well defined lower limit, the basal chromospheric Mg II h+k line flux of cool giant chromospheres, as a function of T_eff. A total of 16 giants were observed several times, over a period of up to 20 years. Their respective minimal Mg II h+k line fluxes confirm the basal flux limit very well because none of their emissions dip beneath the empirically deduced basal flux line representative for the overall sample. Based on a total of 15 to 22 objects with very low Mg II h+k emission, we find as limit: log F_Mg_h+k = 7.33 log T_eff - 21.75 (cgs units; based on B-V). Within its uncertainties, this is almost the same relation as has been found in the past for the geometrically much thinner chromospheres of main sequence stars. Concerning any residual dependence of the basal flux on the surface gravity it can be stated that over a gravity range of more than four orders of magnitude (main-sequence stars to supergiants), the basal flux does not appear to vary by more than a factor of 2. These findings are in good agreement with the predictions by previous hydrodynamic models of acoustic wave propagation and energy dissipation, as well as with earlier empirical determinations. Finally, we discuss the idea that the ample energy flux of the chromospheric acoustic waves in a cool giant may yield, as a by-product, the energy flux required by its cool wind (i.e., non-dust-driven, "Reimers-type" mass-loss).