The ATLAS3D project - III. A census of the stellar angular momentum within the effective radius of early-type galaxies: unveiling the distribution of Fast and Slow Rotators
Eric Emsellem, Michele Cappellari, Davor Krajnovi\'c, Katherine, Alatalo, Leo Blitz, Maxime Bois, Fr\'ed\'eric Bournaud, Martin Bureau, Roger, L. Davies, Timothy A. Davis, P. T. de Zeeuw, Sadegh Khochfar, Harald, Kuntschner, Pierre-Yves Lablanche, Richard M. McDermid

TL;DR
This study classifies early-type galaxies into Fast and Slow Rotators based on stellar angular momentum, revealing that most are Fast Rotators with regular rotation, while a smaller fraction are Slow Rotators often featuring complex kinematics.
Contribution
Introduces a new criterion for distinguishing Fast and Slow Rotators using LambdaR and ellipticity, improving classification accuracy over previous methods.
Findings
86% of early-type galaxies are Fast Rotators with regular rotation.
14% of early-type galaxies are Slow Rotators, often massive and with complex kinematics.
Most Slow Rotators are round, massive, and exhibit KDCs.
Abstract
We provide a census of the apparent stellar angular momentum within 1 Re of a volume-limited sample of 260 early-type galaxies (ETGs) in the nearby Universe, using integral-field spectroscopy obtained in the course of the ATLAS3D project. We exploit the LambdaR parameter to characterise the existence of two families of ETGs: Slow Rotators which exhibit complex stellar velocity fields and often include stellar kinematically Distinct Cores (KDCs), and Fast Rotators which have regular velocity fields. Our complete sample of 260 ETGs leads to a new criterion to disentangle Fast and Slow Rotators which now includes a dependency on the apparent ellipticity (Epsilon). It separates the two classes significantly better than the previous prescription, and than a criterion based on V/Sigma: Slow Rotators and Fast Rotators have LambdaR lower and larger than kFSxSQRT(Epsilon), respectively, where…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
