TL;DR
This paper introduces a nonparametric, monotone decreasing weight function approach for modeling publication bias in meta analysis, providing more flexible and insightful analysis than existing parametric methods.
Contribution
It develops a new methodology for estimating decreasing weight functions in selection models, with implementation in an R package for reproducibility.
Findings
The approach offers more flexible modeling of publication bias.
It provides confidence intervals for treatment effects adjusted for bias.
The method is illustrated on well-known meta analysis examples.
Abstract
Publication bias, the fact that studies identified for inclusion in a meta analysis do not represent all studies on the topic of interest, is commonly recognized as a threat to the validity of the results of a meta analysis. One way to explicitly model publication bias is via selection models or weighted probability distributions. We adopt the nonparametric approach initially introduced by Dear (1992) but impose that the weight function is monotonely non-increasing as a function of the -value. Since in meta analysis one typically only has few studies or "observations", regularization of the estimation problem seems sensible. In addition, virtually all parametric weight functions proposed so far in the literature are in fact decreasing. We discuss how to estimate a decreasing weight function in the above model and illustrate the new methodology on two well-known examples. The new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
