Equivalence Principle and Gravitational Redshift
Michael A. Hohensee, Steven Chu, Achim Peters, Holger Mueller

TL;DR
This paper explores deviations from general relativity that violate the Einstein equivalence principle, demonstrating the equivalence of different experimental tests and providing comprehensive limits on such violations.
Contribution
It shows the equivalence of matter wave and clock comparison experiments and sets limits on EEP-violating terms using multiple experimental methods.
Findings
Limits on EEP-violating terms at the 10^{-6} level
Equivalence of matter wave and clock comparison experiments
Comprehensive analysis of various experimental constraints
Abstract
We investigate leading order deviations from general relativity that violate the Einstein equivalence principle in the gravitational standard model extension. We show that redshift experiments based on matter waves and clock comparisons are equivalent to one another. Consideration of torsion balance tests, along with matter wave, microwave, optical, and M\"ossbauer clock tests, yields comprehensive limits on spin-independent Einstein equivalence principle-violating standard model extension terms at the level.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
