Model-checking ATL under Imperfect Information and Perfect Recall Semantics is Undecidable
Catalin Dima, Ferucio Laurentiu Tiplea

TL;DR
This paper proves that model checking ATL with imperfect information and perfect recall semantics is undecidable by reducing it from the non-halting problem of Turing machines, filling a gap in formal verification literature.
Contribution
It provides the first formal proof of undecidability for ATL model checking under these semantics, using a reduction from Turing machine non-halting problem.
Findings
Model checking ATL under these semantics is undecidable.
The proof is based on a reduction from Turing machine non-halting problem.
Addresses a previously unproven claim of undecidability.
Abstract
We propose a formal proof of the undecidability of the model checking problem for alternating- time temporal logic under imperfect information and perfect recall semantics. This problem was announced to be undecidable according to a personal communication on multi-player games with imperfect information, but no formal proof was ever published. Our proof is based on a direct reduction from the non-halting problem for Turing machines.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems
