Model-dependence of the $\gamma Z$ dispersion correction to the parity-violating asymmetry in elastic $ep$ scattering
Mikhail Gorchtein, C. J. Horowitz, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the theoretical uncertainties in the gamma-Z dispersion correction to the parity-violating asymmetry in elastic electron-proton scattering, providing a refined Standard Model prediction for the proton's weak charge and suggesting future measurements to reduce uncertainties.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of model-dependent uncertainties in the gamma-Z dispersion correction, improving the precision of the Standard Model prediction for the proton's weak charge.
Findings
Estimated the gamma-Z correction at Q-Weak kinematics as (0.0054±0.0020) in proton weak charge.
Provided a new Standard Model prediction for the asymmetry: (0.0767±0.0008±0.0020_{γZ}).
Identified future low-energy measurements as a means to reduce theoretical uncertainties.
Abstract
We analyze the dispersion correction to elastic parity violating electron-proton scattering due to exchange. In particular, we explore the theoretical uncertainties associated with modeling contributions of hadronic intermediate states. Taking into account constraints from low- and high-energy, parity-conserving electroproduction measurements, choosing different models for contributions from the non-resonant processes, and performing the corresponding flavor rotations to obtain the electroweak amplitude, we arrive at an estimate of the uncertainty in the total contribution to the parity-violating asymmetry. At the kinematics of the Q-Weak experiment, we obtain a correction to the asymmetry equivalent to a shift in the proton weak charge of . This should be compared to the value of the proton's weak charge of that includes SM…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
