On the Gain of Joint Processing of Pilot and Data Symbols in Stationary Rayleigh Fading Channels
Meik D\"orpinghaus, Adrian Ispas, Heinrich Meyr

TL;DR
This paper investigates the potential benefits of jointly processing pilot and data symbols in stationary Rayleigh fading channels, showing that it can improve channel estimation accuracy and achievable data rates compared to separate processing.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new lower bound on the achievable rate for joint pilot and data processing and analyzes the information gain from temporal correlation in channel estimation errors.
Findings
Joint processing captures additional information from channel estimation error correlation.
A new lower bound on achievable rate for joint processing is derived.
Joint processing can outperform separate processing in stationary Rayleigh fading channels.
Abstract
In many typical mobile communication receivers the channel is estimated based on pilot symbols to allow for a coherent detection and decoding in a separate processing step. Currently much work is spent on receivers which break up this separation, e.g., by enhancing channel estimation based on reliability information on the data symbols. In the present work, we evaluate the possible gain of a joint processing of data and pilot symbols in comparison to the case of a separate processing in the context of stationary Rayleigh flat-fading channels. Therefore, we discuss the nature of the possible gain of a joint processing of pilot and data symbols. We show that the additional information that can be gained by a joint processing is captured in the temporal correlation of the channel estimation error of the solely pilot based channel estimation, which is not retrieved by the channel decoder in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
