PaperBricks: An Alternative to Complete-Story Peer Reviewing

TL;DR

The paper proposes 'paper bricks', a new peer review system designed to address flaws in traditional peer review by enabling shorter publications and fostering faster innovation with minimal system changes.

Contribution

It introduces 'paper bricks', a novel peer review approach that improves publication efficiency and innovation without major modifications to existing systems.

Findings

Reduces review times and reviewer overload.

Encourages competition and new ideas.

Accelerates the innovation process.

Abstract

The peer review system as used in several computer science communities has several flaws including long review times, overloaded reviewers, as well as fostering of niche topics. These flaws decrease quality, lower impact, slowdown the innovation process, and lead to frustration of authors, readers, and reviewers. In order to fix this, we propose a new peer review system termed paper bricks. Paper bricks has several advantages over the existing system including shorter publications, better competition for new ideas, as well as an accelerated innovation process. Furthermore, paper bricks may be implemented with minimal change to the existing peer review systems.