Solar-like oscillations and activity in Procyon: A comparison of the 2007 MOST and ground-based radial velocity campaigns
Daniel Huber, Timothy R. Bedding, Torben Arentoft, Michael, Gruberbauer, David B. Guenther, G\"unter Houdek, Thomas Kallinger, Hans, Kjeldsen, Jaymie M. Matthews, Dennis Stello, Werner W. Weiss

TL;DR
This study compares space-based photometry and ground-based radial velocity data of Procyon, confirming stellar activity signatures and analyzing oscillation modes, amplitudes, and their frequency dependence to improve understanding of stellar oscillations.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of photometric and radial velocity observations of Procyon, confirming activity signatures and analyzing oscillation amplitudes and mode identification.
Findings
Confirmed activity signatures in both datasets.
Measured luminosity amplitude per mode as 9.1 ppm.
Found amplitude ratio higher than scaling relations predict.
Abstract
We compare the simultaneous 2007 space-based MOST photometry and ground-based radial velocity observations of the F5 star Procyon. We identify slow variations in the MOST data that are similar to those reported in the radial velocity (RV) time series, and confirm by comparison with the Sun that these variations are likely the signature of stellar activity. The MOST power spectrum yields clear evidence for individual oscillation frequencies that match those found in the radial velocity data by Bedding et al. (2010). We identify the same ridges due to modes of different spherical degree in both datasets, but are not able to confirm a definite ridge identification using the MOST data. We measure the luminosity amplitude per radial mode A_{l=0, phot} = 9.1 +/- 0.5 ppm. Combined with the estimate for the RV data by Arentoft et al. (2008) this gives a mean amplitude ratio of A_{l=0,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
