High-energy strong interactions: from `hard' to `soft'
M. G. Ryskin, A.D. Martin, V.A. Khoze

TL;DR
This paper explores the connection between 'hard' and 'soft' high-energy interactions, proposing a model that extends perturbative QCD into the soft domain and explains the infrared cutoff as due to strong absorption of low transverse momentum partons.
Contribution
It introduces a model matching soft high-energy hadron interactions with perturbative QCD, incorporating BFKL features and multi-Pomeron exchanges, to explain the infrared cutoff physically.
Findings
Monte Carlo models require a large infrared cutoff (~2-3 GeV) that increases with energy.
The proposed model reproduces total, elastic, and dissociation cross sections, and predicts gluon PDFs consistent with data.
The model provides predictions for LHC energies and implications for cosmic rays.
Abstract
We discuss the qualitative features of the recent data on multiparticle production observed at the LHC. The tolerable agreement with Monte Carlos based on LO DGLAP evolution indicates that there is no qualitative difference between `hard' and `soft' interactions; and that a perturbative QCD approach may be extended into the soft domain. However, in order to describe the data, these Monte Carlos need an additional infrared cutoff k_min with a value k_min ~ 2-3 GeV which is not small, and which increases with collider energy. Here we explain the physical origin of the large k_min. Using an alternative model which matches the `soft' high-energy hadron interactions smoothly on to perturbative QCD at small x, we demonstrate that this effective cutoff k_min is actually due to the strong absorption of low k_t partons. The model embodies the main features of the BFKL approach, including the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
