Decision Theory with Prospect Interference and Entanglement
V.I. Yukalov, D. Sornette

TL;DR
This paper introduces a quantum-inspired decision theory that models human decision anomalies like the disjunction effect and conjunction fallacy through interference and entanglement, providing quantitative explanations for these phenomena.
Contribution
It develops a mathematical framework using Hilbert spaces to explain decision anomalies via interference effects, advancing beyond classical decision theories.
Findings
Disjunction effect explained by intention interference under uncertainty.
Conjunction fallacy modeled by interference terms, matching experimental data.
Interference effects predict and unify multiple decision-making fallacies.
Abstract
We present a novel variant of decision making based on the mathematical theory of separable Hilbert spaces. This mathematical structure captures the effect of superposition of composite prospects, including many incorporated intentions, which allows us to describe a variety of interesting fallacies and anomalies that have been reported to particularize the decision making of real human beings. The theory characterizes entangled decision making, non-commutativity of subsequent decisions, and intention interference. We demonstrate how the violation of the Savage's sure-thing principle, known as the disjunction effect, can be explained quantitatively as a result of the interference of intentions, when making decisions under uncertainty. The disjunction effects, observed in experiments, are accurately predicted using a theorem on interference alternation that we derive, which connects…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
