How likely is speciation in neutral ecology ?
Philippe Desjardins-Proulx, Dominique Gravel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the likelihood of speciation within neutral ecology models by incorporating spatially-explicit population genetics, revealing limitations in species diversity achievable under neutral processes alone.
Contribution
It introduces a spatially-explicit neutral model with gene flow and speciation mechanisms, highlighting the constraints of neutral processes on biodiversity.
Findings
Neutral models with realistic mutation rates support few species.
Adding natural selection increases species number but still falls short of observed diversity.
Neutral processes alone are insufficient to explain high biodiversity levels.
Abstract
Patterns of biodiversity predicted by the neutral theory rely on a simple phenomenological model of speciation. To further investigate the effect of speciation on neutral biodiversity, we analyze a spatially-explicit neutral model based on population genetics. We define the metacommunity as a system of populations exchanging migrants and we use this framework to introduce speciation with little or no gene flow (allopatric and parapatric speciation). We find that with realistic mutation rates, our metacommunity model driven by neutral processes cannot support more than a few species. Adding natural selection in the population genetics of speciation increases the number of species in the metacommunity but the level of diversity found in Barro Colorado Island is difficult to reach.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
