The Evolution of Cataclysmic Variables as Revealed by their Donor Stars
Christian Knigge (University of Southampton), Isabelle Baraffe, (University of Exeter), Joseph Patterson (Columbia University)

TL;DR
This paper reconstructs the evolutionary path of cataclysmic variables using donor star data, calibrates stellar models, and refines the understanding of angular momentum loss mechanisms, improving predictions of CV properties and evolution.
Contribution
It updates the semi-empirical CV donor sequence, calibrates stellar models for CVs, and refines AML prescriptions, providing a more accurate evolutionary framework for CVs.
Findings
Optimal AML scaling factors: f_GR=2.47 below gap, f_MB=0.66 above gap.
Revised sequence correctly predicts CV minimum period and period gap edges.
Predicts a higher ratio of long- to short-period CVs, addressing previous discrepancies.
Abstract
We reconstruct the evolutionary path followed by cataclysmic variables (CVs) from the observed mass-radius relationship of their donor stars. Along the way, we update the semi-empirical CV donor sequence of Knigge (2006) and present a comprehensive review of the link between CV evolution and donor physics. After calibrating state-of-the art stellar models for use in the CV setting, we fit self-consistent theoretical evolution sequences to the observed donor masses and radii. In the standard model of CV evolution, AML below the period gap is assumed to be driven solely by gravitational radiation (GR), while AML above the gap is usually described by a magnetic braking prescription due to Rappaport, Verbunt & Joss (1983). We find that simple scaled versions of these recipes match the data quite well. However, the optimal scaling factors turn out to be f_GR = 2.47 +/- 0.22 below the gap and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
