What can be learned from binding energy differences about nuclear structure: the example of delta V_{pn}
Michael Bender, Paul-Henri Heenen

TL;DR
This study analyzes the binding energy difference delta V_{pn} using a realistic nuclear model, revealing it mainly reflects symmetry energy and collective effects, and is not a reliable indicator of nuclear structure or proton-neutron interactions.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that delta V_{pn} can be explained by symmetry energy and collective fluctuations, challenging its use as a structural indicator in nuclear physics.
Findings
delta V_{pn} is well described by symmetry energy and collective correlations.
The pattern around doubly-magic nuclei is due to definition, not structure.
delta V_{pn} is unreliable for detecting structural changes or proton-neutron interactions.
Abstract
We perform an analysis of a binding energy difference called delta V_{pn}(N,Z) =- 1/4(E(Z,N)-E(Z,N-2)-E(Z-2,N)+ E(Z-2,N-2) in the framework of a realistic nuclear model. Using the angular-momentum and particle-number projected generator coordinate method and the Skyrme interaction SLy4, we analyze the contribution brought to delta V_{pn} by static deformation and dynamic fluctuations around the mean-field ground state. Our method gives a good overall description of delta V_{pn} throughout the chart of nuclei with the exception of the anomaly related to the Wigner energy along the N=Z line. The main conclusions of our analysis are that (i) the structures seen in the systematics of delta V_{pn} throughout the chart of nuclei can be easily explained combining a smooth background related to the symmetry energy and correlation energies due to deformation and collective fluctuations; (ii) the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
