On interpretation of recent proper motion data for the Large Magellanic Cloud
Kenji Bekki

TL;DR
Recent proper motion measurements of the Large Magellanic Cloud may significantly deviate from the true motion due to local random motions, but averaging over many fields can improve accuracy.
Contribution
This study demonstrates how local random motions can cause deviations in proper motion measurements and suggests that larger sample sizes reduce this bias.
Findings
Deviation can be as large as 50 km/s (~0.21 mas/yr) due to local motions.
Number of sampled fields affects the accuracy of proper motion estimates.
Averaging over ~1000 fields yields a closer estimate to the true proper motion.
Abstract
Recent observational studies using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) have derived the center-of-mass proper motion (CMPM) of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Although these studies carefully treated both rotation and perspective effects in deriving the proper motion for each of the sampled fields, they did not consider the effects of local random motion in the derivation. This means that the average PM of the fields (i.e., the observed CMPM) could significantly deviate from the true CMPM, because the effect of local random motion can not be close to zero in making the average PM for the small number of the fields (~10). We discuss how significantly the observationally derived CMPM can deviate from the true CMPM by applying the same method as used in the observations for a dynamical model of the LMC with a known true CMPM. We find that the deviation can be as large as ~ 50 km/s (~0.21…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
