There is no variational characterization of the cycles in the method of periodic projections
J.-B. Baillon, P. L. Combettes, and R. Cominetti

TL;DR
This paper proves that for three or more convex sets, the limit cycles of the periodic projection method cannot be characterized as minimizers of any functional, answering a long-standing open question.
Contribution
It provides a negative answer to the open question about variational characterization of cycles in the method of periodic projections for multiple sets.
Findings
Limit cycles for m ≥ 3 sets are not variational minimizers.
The paper discusses projection algorithms for convex functions over product sets.
Answers a question dating back to the 1960s about the nature of these cycles.
Abstract
The method of periodic projections consists in iterating projections onto closed convex subsets of a Hilbert space according to a periodic sweeping strategy. In the presence of sets, a long-standing question going back to the 1960s is whether the limit cycles obtained by such a process can be characterized as the minimizers of a certain functional. In this paper we answer this question in the negative. Projection algorithms that minimize smooth convex functions over a product of convex sets are also discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimization and Variational Analysis · Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research · Topology Optimization in Engineering
