Analysis of the Data from Compton X-ray Polarimeters which Measure the Azimuthal and Polar Scattering Angles
Henric Krawczynski (Washington University in St. Louis, McDonnell, Center for the Space Sciences)

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that using both azimuthal and polar scattering angles in Compton polarimeter data analysis improves polarization detection sensitivity by about 20%, enhancing measurements of astrophysical X-ray sources.
Contribution
It introduces a Maximum Likelihood analysis method utilizing both scattering angles, showing significant improvement over traditional azimuthal-only analysis in X-ray polarimetry.
Findings
Maximum Likelihood analysis reduces the Minimum Detectable Polarization by ~20%.
Polarization measurement accuracy improves with the combined angle analysis.
Potential applications extend to various polarimeter experiments.
Abstract
X-ray polarimetry has the potential to make key-contributions to our understanding of galactic compact objects like binary black hole systems and neutron stars, and extragalactic objects like active galactic nuclei, blazars, and Gamma Ray Bursts. Furthermore, several particle astrophysics topics can be addressed including uniquely sensitive tests of Lorentz invariance. In the energy range from 10 keV to several MeV, Compton polarimeters achieve the best performance. In this paper we evaluate the benefit that comes from using the azimuthal and polar angles of the Compton scattered photons in the analysis, rather than using the azimuthal scattering angles alone. We study the case of an ideal Compton polarimeter and show that a Maximum Likelihood analysis which uses the two scattering angles lowers the Minimum Detectable Polarization (MDP) by ~20% compared to a standard analysis based on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
