On the Formation of Double White Dwarfs through Stable Mass Transfer and a Common Envelope
T.E. Woods, N. Ivanova, M. van der Sluys, S. Chaichenets

TL;DR
This paper investigates the formation of double white dwarfs through stable mass transfer and common envelope phases, challenging traditional prescriptions and proposing a scenario where the first mass transfer can be stable, leading to observed DWD properties.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a stable, non-conservative mass transfer can occur in certain binary systems, enabling the formation of double white dwarfs consistent with observations, and questions the adequacy of existing prescriptions.
Findings
Gamma-prescription cannot universally describe CE events.
First mass transfer phase can be stable in low-mass companion systems.
Proposed mechanism reproduces observed DWD properties.
Abstract
Although several dozen double white dwarfs (DWDs) have been observed, for many the exact nature of the evolutionary channel(s) by which they form remains uncertain. The canonical explanation calls for the progenitor binary system to undergo two subsequent mass-transfer events, both of which are unstable and lead to a common envelope (CE). However, it has been shown that if both CE events obey the standard alpha-prescription (parametrizing energy loss), it is not possible to reproduce all of the observed systems. The gamma-prescription was proposed as an alternative to this description, instead parametrizing the fraction of angular momentum carried away in dynamical-timescale mass loss. In this paper, we analyze simultaneous energy and angular-momentum conservation, and show that the gamma-prescription cannot adequately describe a CE event for an arbitrary binary, nor can the first phase…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
