On hadronic beam models for quasars and microquasars

TL;DR

This paper corrects previous models of particle distributions in hadronic jets of quasars and microquasars, showing that earlier calculations overestimated gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes, especially at larger viewing angles.

Contribution

It derives accurate particle distribution expressions using relativistic invariants, correcting errors in prior models and impacting predictions of high-energy emissions.

Findings

Earlier models overpredict proton spectra at high energies for large viewing angles.

Corrected models show significantly lower gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes than previous estimates.

Implications suggest reduced likelihood of detecting hadronic beams with current observational facilities.

Abstract

Most of the hadronic jet models for quasars (QSOs) and microquasars (MQs) found in literature represent beams of particles (e.g. protons). These particles interact with the matter in the stellar wind of the companion star in the system or with crossing clouds, generating gamma-rays via proton-proton processes. Our aim is to derive the particle distribution in the jet as seen by the observer, so that proper computation of the $\gamma$-ray and neutrino yields can be done. We use relativistic invariants to obtain the transformed expressions in the case of a power-law and power-law with a cutoff particle distribution in the beam. We compare with previous expressions used earlier in the literature. We show that formerly used expressions for the particle distributions in the beam as seen by the observer are in error, differences being strongly dependent on the viewing angle. For example, for $\Gamma =10$ ($\Gamma$ is the Lorentz factor of the blob) and angles larger than $\sim 20^o$, the earlier-used calculation entails an over-prediction (order of magnitude or more) of the proton spectra for $E>\Gamma mc^2$, whereas it always over-predicts (two orders of magnitude) the proton spectrum at lower energies, disregarding the viewing angle. All the results for photon and neutrino fluxes in hadronic models in beams that have made use of the earlier calculation are affected. Given that correct gamma-ray fluxes will be in almost any case significantly diminished in comparison with published results, and that the time of observations in Cherenkov facilities grows with the square of the flux-reduction factor in a statistically limited result, the possibility of observing hadronic beams is undermined.