Gamow-Teller Unit Cross Sections for (t,3He) and (3He,t) Reactions
G. Perdikakis, R.G.T. Zegers, Sam M. Austin, D. Bazin, C. Caesar, J.M., Deaven, A. Gade, D. Galaviz, G. Grinyer, C. J. Guess, C. Herlitzius, G.W., Hitt, M.E. Howard, R. Meharchand, S. Noji, H. Sakai, Y. Shimbara, E.E. Smith, and C. Tur

TL;DR
This study investigates the proportionality of differential cross sections to Gamow-Teller transition strength for ($t$, $^{3}$He) and ($^{3}$He$, t$) reactions across various target masses, establishing a simple mass-dependent relation for unit cross sections.
Contribution
It provides a unified description of Gamow-Teller unit cross sections for ($t$, $^{3}$He) and ($^{3}$He$, t$) reactions, including new data and phenomenological models for mass dependence.
Findings
Unit cross sections follow a nearly identical A-dependent trend for A ≥ 12.
Simple phenomenological functions describe the mass dependence of the distortion and interaction factors.
Short-range approximations overestimate cross sections in theoretical calculations.
Abstract
The proportionality between differential cross sections at vanishing linear momentum transfer and Gamow-Teller transition strength, expressed in terms of the \textit{unit cross section} () was studied as a function of target mass number for (,He) and (He,) reactions at 115 MeV and 140 MeV, respectively. Existing (He,) and (,He) data on targets with mass number were complemented with new and reevaluated (,He) data on proton, deuteron, Li and C targets. It was found that in spite of the small difference in beam energies between the two probes, the unit cross sections have a nearly identical and simple dependence on target mass number , for : . The factorization of the unit cross sections in terms of a kinematical factor, a distortion factor and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
