On the Connectivity of Bipartite Distance-Balanced Graphs
Stefko Miklavic, Primoz Sparl

TL;DR
This paper investigates the structure of bipartite distance-balanced graphs, disproves a conjecture about their connectivity, and classifies certain non-3-connected cases, revealing their regularity and uniqueness.
Contribution
It answers Handa's question negatively by providing counterexamples, classifies minimal non-3-connected bipartite distance-balanced graphs, and characterizes their structural properties.
Findings
Counterexamples to Handa's conjecture exist.
Minimal non-3-connected bipartite distance-balanced graphs have 18 vertices and are unique.
All such graphs with a certain property are regular and form infinite families.
Abstract
A connected graph is said to be {\it distance-balanced} whenever for any pair of adjacent vertices of the number of vertices closer to than to is equal to the number of vertices closer to than to . In [Bipartite graphs with balanced -partitions, {\em Ars Combin.} {\bf 51} (1999), 113-119] Handa asked whether every bipartite distance-balanced graph, that is not a cycle, is 3-connected. In this paper the Handa question is answered in the negative. Moreover, we show that a minimal bipartite distance-balanced graph, that is not a cycle and is not 3-connected, has 18 vertices and is unique. In addition, we give a complete classification of non-3-connected bipartite distance-balanced graphs for which the minimal distance between two vertices in a 2-cut is three. All such graphs are regular and for each there exists an infinite family of such…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Interconnection Networks and Systems · Graph theory and applications
