GRB 081029: Understanding Multiple Afterglow Components
S. T. Holland (1) (2) (3), M. De Pasquale (4), J. Mao (5), T. Sakamoto, (1) (3) (6), P. Schady (7), S. Covino (5) P. D'Avanzo (5), A. Antonelli (8),, V. D'Elia (8), G. Chincarini (5), F. Fiore (8), and S. B. Pandey (9) ((1), CRESST, (2) USRA, (3) NASA's GSFC, (4) MSSL

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the complex optical and X-ray afterglow of GRB 081029, revealing that a multi-component jet model better explains the unusual light curve features than a single-component model.
Contribution
It introduces a multi-component jet model to explain the unusual afterglow features of GRB 081029, challenging previous single-component jet interpretations.
Findings
Optical afterglow shows an uncharacteristic rise at 5000 s.
X-ray afterglow exhibits a shallow decay followed by rapid decay.
Single-component jet models are inconsistent with observed data.
Abstract
We present an analysis of the unusual optical light curve of the gamma-ray burst GRB~081029, which occurred at a redshift of z = 3.8479$. We combine X-ray and optical observations from the Swift X-Ray Telescope and the Swift UltraViolet/Optical Telescope with optical and infrared data obtained using the REM and ROTSE telescopes to construct a detailed data set extending from 86 s to approximately 100,000 s after the BAT trigger. Our data also cover a wide energy range, from 10 keV to 0.77 eV (1.24 Angstrom to 16,000 Angstrom). The X-ray afterglow shows a shallow initial decay followed by a rapid decay starting at about 18,000s. The optical and infrared afterglow, however, shows an uncharacteristic rise at about 5000 s that does not correspond to any feature in the X-ray light curve. Our data are not consistent with synchrotron radiation from a single-component jet interacting with an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
